INTRODUCTION
Fire is a natural component of savanna ecosystems. Many of the
common species in these systems have evolved with fire, and have developed
morphological mechanisms to escape the effects of fire. Because fire is a
natural part of the system, it must be considered in the management of the
system. Fire affects woody plants in a variety of ways, depending on the time
and conditions of the burn, as well as the frequency that a certain area is
burnt. In gaining an understanding of the vegetation (and therefore being able
to manage it properly), the effect of fire on both the bush and the grass needs
to be addressed. Furthermore, questions such as the reasons for burning, when
and how often to burn, and, finally, what to do after the burn, need to be
answered. The objective of this Production Guideline is to clarify these issues,
and it should therefore be read in conjunction with Production Guideline 7.5 in
this series.
PLANT ADAPTATIONS
Grasses
Adaptations of the grass plant to burning have been
comprehensively covered in Production Guideline 7.5 in this series. A normal
fire will not affect the grass plant provided that it is burnt while the plant
is dormant. The plant becomes dormant during periods of stress (usually
drought or cold) and, during this phase, growth ceases. A fire at this time
will not harm the plant as most of the nutrients will have been translocated
to storage organs at the base of the stems. Once normal growth has been
resumed, however, the stored nutrients are transported to the new leaves for
growth, and thus the storage depots become depleted. Should the plant be burnt
at this stage, the developing leaves are destroyed and the plant is placed
under stress when growth continues, as fewer reserve nutrients are available
for recovery. This consequently leads to a decline in vigour and may even
result in the death of the plant.
Grass plants that are not defoliated regularly tend to
accumulate old dead leaf material which eventually smothers the plant, and
either reduces its vigour, or kills it completely. From a grazing perspective
this accumulation of old material is undesirable because animals find it
unpalatable and it restricts access to the new, palatable growth within the
tuft. Removal of the dead growth stimulates the plant to produce new, palatable
lateral tillers which are highly acceptable to animals.
Woody plants
In certain areas, fire will actually kill trees if it
is sufficiently intense, and if the trees are burnt after spring growth has
commenced. This generally occurs in areas where spring rains are late and ground
water is used by woody plants for initial growth. In these cases, the grass
layer will still be dry enough to sustain an intense fire because spring growth
would not have been initiated due to the lack of water in the topsoil. However,
in most of the KwaZulu-Natal savannas, spring growth of the woody plants
coincides with the comparatively early rains. It now becomes difficult to
implement an intense burn at the onset of the first growth of the woody plants,
as the spring rains would also have stimulated the grass plants to start
growing. The grasses should never be burnt once they have started to grow.
Mechanisms evolved by woody plants to survive fire are
diverse, and the more important concepts are discussed below.
Dormant buds
The aerial parts of woody plants (branches, leaves,
flowers, fruit) all result from growth initiated from meristematic tissue at the
growth tips of the plant. These growth tips or apical buds usually produce
chemical hormones which suppress growth in buds which are situated lower down on
the branch. This causes the lower buds to remain in a dormant condition, a
situation referred to as apical dominance.
As the plant increases in size so the apical buds are found at
an increasing height above ground level. If such a plant is exposed to a fire,
topkill of the canopy will often result (unless the individual plant is large,
or the fire relatively cool), and apical dominance is removed. This situation
stimulates growth in the dormant buds lower down on the stem, provided they have
not been killed by the fire. Coppicing from basal dormant buds is common in
savanna trees and shrubs. These buds are situated at the stem base (at ground
level) where temperatures during the fire are relatively lower than in the
canopy, and, consequently, chances of survival are higher.
Corky bark
Certain savanna trees and shrubs have evolved a thick,
corky bark which effectively insulates the stem from the high temperatures
caused by the fire. A prime example of this phenomenon is provided by certain
Australian eucalypts, which have a thick, corky bark only to flame height, and a
smooth, thin bark above that point. In KwaZulu-Natal, many species exhibit this
survival mechanism. Examples are paperbark thorn (Acacia sieberana),
scented thorn (A. nilotica), common spikethorn (Maytenus heterophylla)
and cabbage tree (Cussonia spicata), among others.
Suffrutices
A suffrutex is a large, woody, underground rootstock
which is essentially a storage organ. Plants with suffrutices are therefore
well-adapted to survive fire, as the growing points of the plant are situated
below the critical heat level of the fire, and reserve nutrients are
well-supplied. KwaZulu-Natal examples of these plants include sumach bean (Elephantorrhiza
elephantina), mobola plum (Parinari capensis) and ploughbreaker (Erythrina
zeyheri).
BURNING AS A MANAGEMENT TOOL
As the woody vegetation in the savanna areas of KwaZulu-Natal
has evolved with fire, it is important that fire is included in the management
of this vegetation type. Important considerations when burning savanna are the
reasons for burning, when to burn, how frequently to burn, and how to manage the
post-burn vegetation.
Why burn?
This is the problem that faces most farmers and
other land owners in any area where extensive farming systems make use of the
veld. In bushveld areas (i.e. BRG’s 21, 22 and 23), permission must be
obtained from the local extension office of the KwaZulu-Natal Department of
Agriculture before burning. There are two justifiable reasons for burning in
the savanna. Firstly, fire can be used as a management tool to remove old,
dead, unpalatable grass material that has no use as forage. This residual
material tends to smother the grass plant (it becomes moribund), and will
eventually kill it. Secondly, fire may be used as a tool to manipulate the
bush (i.e. kill trees or lower the canopy to provide browse).
As has been discussed above, fire is not effective in killing
most woody plants, but it rather causes topkill in small individuals. Certain
broadleaf woody plants arekilled by fire, and therefore fire can be used as a
management tool in situations where broadleaf plants predominate. Lowering the
canopy of the woody component is achieved by fire and is an economical method of
providing good-quality, accessible forage in browser enterprises. The main
objective of burning where browsers are not widely used, therefore, is to
maintain a healthy herbaceous layer by removing dead material.
A further consideration in sweetveld areas is that setting
fire to potential reserve grazing is similar to burning money. Very often, the
lost production in real terms following a burn will exceed the costs of
implementing another form of bush control (refer to Production Guideline 7.7 in
this series).
When to burn, and how often?
From the above discussion it should be obvious that
the best time to burn is during the winter or early spring, while the grass
plants are still in the dormant phase. In fact, it should be theoretically
possible to burn during a mid-summer drought period and not affect the vigour of
the grass plants, provided that the plants are dormant when burnt. Timing the
burn can be difficult in these areas due to the unpredictable and erratic nature
of the rainfall. In many cases, a farmer might burn a portion of the farm for
bush control, only to be faced with a subsequent shortage of grazing as a result
of late spring rains.
The question of how often to burn is difficult to answer
simply. The erratic nature of the rainfall has a direct influence on grass
production. As a result one cannot prescribe a regular burning cycle (for
instance every four or five years). It is a better strategy to adopt an ‘opportunistic’
policy and to burn whenever it is considered necessary (i.e. when there is an
accumulation of old grass which might be a threat to the survival of the
desirable plants, or during wet cycles). If stocking rates on the farm are
sufficiently low to result in a fairly rapid accumulation of fuel, fires should
be fairly regular. This will ensure that when a fire is implemented, it will not
be too intense and thus will not be a threat to the larger trees. At the same
time, these fires will effectively control broadleaf woody plants.
Post-burn management
Veld management after a fire should be aimed at
maintaining a vigorous, competitive sward which will provide a sustainable
source of forage, and actively prevent woody seedlings from establishing. The
post-fire management of the herbaceous component has been covered in Production
Guideline 7.5 in this series, and the principles also apply to savanna.
Management of the post-fire woody vegetation depends mainly on the objectives of
the enterprise. If the burn was implemented in order to provide forage for
browsers, the burnt vegetation should be included in a suitable browsing system.
The vegetation should be provided with a rest period following the burn in order
for adequate browse to be produced. If insufficient browsable material is
available, the animals will be forced to feed relatively more on the sprouting
grass before the browsable plants have recovered from the burn.