INTRODUCTION
The way in which animals are grouped into herds has an
important effect on their management, nutrition and performance, and on the
management of the veld on which they run. The most important factors to consider
in deciding on herd groupings are discussed below.
ANIMAL HANDLING AND MANAGEMENT
When cattle of widely differing ages and different sexes are
mixed together, sorting for different operations, such as identification,
castration, dehorning, inocul-ation, dosing and weighing, is more difficult and
young animals are more likely to be injured. The bigger the herd the greater the
problem and the longer the time the whole herd will have to spend unproductively
in kraals. This will result in depressed performance.
Ideally, herds should consist of a single age group and sex,
although the number of camps available might not permit this. The number in a
herd should be such that the animals do not have to spend more than
approximately 2 hours in the kraals for routine handling operations. Based on
this criterion, the maximum number in a herd will depend partly on the
efficiency of the handling facilities. With efficient facilities and good
handling, cow herds of up to 250 or more can be handled satisfactorily. However,
during the lactation period, herds of 150 cows or less are preferable. Young
stock can be run satisfactorily in herds of up to approximately 400 head, but
smaller herds are preferable.
BREEDING MANAGEMENT
The first requirement in breeding management is to isolate
bulls when they are not with the breeding herds. Bulls should be grouped on
their own in a set of special small camps, but if this is not possible they
could be grouped with older steers, if there is such a group.
Breeding heifers should be run separately from cows, for an
earlier and shorter breeding season, and should be mated to virgin bulls (to
prevent injury, reduce spread of disease and to evaluate bulls).
Cull cows rearing their last calves are another group which
need to be separated during the breeding season. Usually they can be most
conveniently isolated from the bulls by pooling them with the young heifers.
If crossbreeding is practiced, specific divisions of the
breeding herd are necessary in order to mate cows to the appropriate bull breed.
Where sire identity is necessary, as in pedigree breeding and progeny testing,
single-sire herds are necessary during the breeding season. However, the
possible advantages of crossbreeding and single-sire herds must be weighed up
against the disadvantages of having more herds and the restrictions that this
places on veld management.
EFFICIENCY OF SUPPLEMENTARY FEEDING
Different classes of animals differ in their feed
requirements, and unless they are separated they cannot be fed efficiently
according to their requirements. Furthermore, when animals of different ages and
sizes are fed together, heavier animals tend to dominate the younger, lighter
animals, so that while the needs of the latter are usually greater, they
actually obtain less feed. For example, it was found that when heifers were
wintered with mature cows with an adequate allocation per head of supplement,
the heifers lost 11 kg, while a similar group of heifers run on their own, with
the same allocation of supplement, gained 20 kg. Similar social dominance
effects are observed between 4 to 5 year old cows and cows over 5 years old.
However, these effects do not appear to be as important between 2 and 3 year old
heifers, or between weaners and yearlings.
As far as possible, where competition for supplementary feed
is likely, heifers should be separated from mature cows, and, ideally, younger
and older cows should be in separate herds. If mixing of age groups is
necessary, it is preferable to mix young age groups with one another such as
weaners and yearlings, or yearlings and 2 year olds, or 2 and 3 year olds,
rather than with older age groups.
PREFERENCE GRAZING
Separating groups with different feed requirements is also
important where grazing of varying quality is available. The nutritional
requirements of first and second calvers are greater than those of mature cows,
and their performance is affected more by the quality of the grazing than is
that of mature cows. Separation of these younger groups, and allocation to them
of the better veld, can improve calving percentages and weaning mass.
Alternatively, separation of groups with higher requirements, such as young
cows, or steers being finished on the veld, and running them ahead of less
demanding stock in a leader and follower system, also may be beneficial.
HERD APPEARANCE
A herd which is uniform in terms of size, type and condition
creates a good impression. This is important in selling stock and can contribute
to the owner's pride and satisfaction and consequently his success.
VELD MANAGEMENT
From the point of view of animal management and performance, a
large number of well sorted, small herds is desirable. However, in order to
apply good veld management it is desirable to have approximately four or more
camps per herd. In the long term, what is good for veld condition and veld
productivity, will be good for animal production, and conversely, if the veld
deteriorates through poor management, animal production will also deteriorate.
It is therefore necessary to make some compromise between the optimum herd
groupings and the maximum number of herds that can be run to allow good veld
management.
EXAMPLES OF HERD GROUPINGS
It is usually necessary to consider herd groupings
specifically for the breeding season, the remainder of summer, and the winter
supplementary feeding season. For each of these periods all the classes of
stock, that it might be desirable to separate, should be listed. Decisions are
then made as to which classes to pool, in order to reduce the number of groups
to that which will enable good veld management with the number of camps that are
available, or could be made available with additional development.
Tables 1, 2 and 3 indicate the main classes of stock to be
considered at the different periods of the year. All classes up to 3 year olds
are included, but the older age groups would not be present if animals were
marketed younger. The headings A, B, C, etc. indicate progressively increasing
degrees of pooling to produce fewer groups. These are intended to serve only as
examples. The priorities as to which classes should be kept
separate and how best to pool different classes to produce the desired number of
groups will vary on different farms. Adjustments also have to be made to the
numbers of animals in the groups to fit them to the grazing capacity of the
available camps.
During the breeding season (Table 1), it is necessary to first
consider which groups of breeding stock should be bulled separately. Situation A
could be applicable where there is no limitation imposed by the number of camps
available, or, in the case of large cattle holdings, where the numbers of head
involved justify the subdivisions of all classes. On larger holdings further
subdivision of each class may be desirable to ensure that the numbers per group
are not excessive. If specific matings are required (e.g. cross-breeding or
single-sire mating) additional breeding herds would be necessary. Situations B
to G indicate ways in which groups could be combined as the number of camps
available is progressively more restricted.
Table 1. Numbers in the Table refer to stock classes allocated
to the same group.
|
Class of stock |
Decreasing number of camps |
|
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
|
Mature cows + calves + bulls
Young cows + calves + bulls
Heifers + bulls
Cull cows + calves (not bulled)
Heifers 3 years surplus
Heifers 2 years surplus
Heifers 1 year
Steers 1 year
Steers 2 years
Steers 3 years |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 |
1
2
3
4
4
5
5
6
7
8 |
1
2
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7 |
1
1
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6 |
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5 |
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4 |
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3 |