INTRODUCTION
In this guideline points to be considered when planning to use
electric fencing are highlighted. Detailed information on the use of electric
fences on the farm is presented in Production Guideline 9.1 of this series.
Veld management systems by nature are managed ‘extensively’
and livestock are often attended to only once or twice a week. An electric fence
network, by contrast, must be monitored on a daily basis. Any faults detected
must be attended to immediately, simply because an electric fence is a
psychological and not a physical barrier, and relies solely on a high voltage at
all times as a deterrent. While the daily monitoring of the network is not a
time-consuming activity, isolation and repair of the fault can be extremely time
consuming, particularly if something else had been planned for that morning! A
badly maintained/operating electric fence is an absolute curse - something to be
avoided at all costs.
ADVANTAGES
If the farmer is prepared to utilize such a fencing system in
his veld management programme and build it properly and correctly, electric
fencing can be (and indeed has been) used successfully as a grazing management
tool. The greatest advantage of electric fencing over other more conventional
types of fencing is its cost-effectiveness. While the management objectives of
both types of fencing are the same (e.g. fencing of homogenous areas, and
controlling the periods of stay and period of absence) roughly three times the
distance of fencing can be erected using electric fencing for the same capital
expenditure when compared with conventional fencing. This means that far more
camps can ultimately be created with a commensurate increase in effective,
overall control of the veld management system.
DISADVANTAGES
An important consideration, especially in the Tall Grassveld,
is the effect of herbage growth contacting the electrified wires. Such contact
results in a drop in voltage throughout the entire network. Fence lines must
therefore be kept relatively free of herbage growth throughout the year, even
during the winter after the plants have died back. Experience has shown that
late winter and autumn are the times of year when voltage fluctuations are
greatest, especially following a heavy overnight dew. For instance, if a voltage
reading is taken at 08h00 and compared with one taken at midday, a difference of
up to 3.5 kV can be recorded. The cause of this is the increased conductivity of
the wet vegetation.
Autumn is also an extremely busy period on most farms (with
the establishing of winter pastures, making silage etc.), and the clearing of
the fence lines tends to be left over until early winter. By this time the
livestock have invariably learned to get through the electric fences, and
retraining of animals has not proved to be easy. Other longer-term alternatives
for controlling vegetation have been attempted, but none have proved
particularly successful (e.g. spraying herbicides, old engine oil and stock salt
solution onto the herbage in an attempt to retard its growth). Most farmers
therefore resort to a spring burn (where possible) and thereafter use a
motorised brush cutter with a good operator to keep the herbage off the lines
during the growing season.
Planning an electric fence
Careful and detailed planning is required before
building the fence. The following points should be considered.
- Soil type. By virtue of their soil-moisture holding
capabilities, clay soils are good conductors of electricity. An ‘all-live’
wiring configuration can and should be used. Sandy soils, by contrast, do
not retain adequate soil-moisture to be good electricity conductors. A ‘live-earth-live’
configuration must therefore be employed. Such a configuration must be kept
free of all herbage. Ease of access for fence maintenance therefore becomes
a top priority when siting fence lines. Whatever fence configuration is
employed, ensure a good earth return circuit under all conditions.
Animal production system
The production system will determine the number of
strands of wire that are required (and the distance between each strand). The
number and length of ‘live’ strands in turn determines the size of energiser
necessary to power the network. Another factor which influences the choice of
energiser is whether or not a fence-voltage monitoring device is to be used or
not. (Should such a device be deemed necessary the fence strands must be
connected in series and not in parallel. Series-connected strands have a higher
resistance to voltage flow and therefore require a more powerful energiser).
- Veld management practices. Veld burning is
invariably part of the management strategy. Fire-proof insulators, steel
wire and hot-dipped, galvanised line-clamps are therefore necessary. (Beware
of porcelain insulators - they crack and ‘leak’ very easily causing
faults which are difficult to identify.) Plastic insulators and poli-wire
are unsuitable as permanent ‘fixtures’.
Other considerations
It is strongly suggested that a robust digital
volt meter be acquired. Experience has indicated that cheaper, alternative volt
meters are easily broken and totally unreliable. The following minimum
voltages must be maintained in the fence to ensure effective livestock control:
Cattle (incl. calves) - 1000 volts
Sheep and goats - 2000 volts
Game - 4000 volts
Security fencing - 5000 volts
In conclusion therefore, electric fencing can be (and has
been) used effectively in a veld management programme - provided it is built
properly, and regularly monitored and maintained.